JCPB vs. BYLD
JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) and BYLD (iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. JCPB is actively managed, while BYLD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JCPB returned 1.11%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for BYLD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JCPB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BYLD.
Performance
JCPB vs. BYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than BYLD's 1.23% return.
JCPB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BYLD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 7.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
JCPB vs. BYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 7.98% | 2.96% | 7.13% | -12.90% | -0.51% | 9.19% | 7.76% |
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 1.23% | 8.41% | 4.17% | 8.30% | -10.33% | -1.25% | 4.25% | 10.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCPB and BYLD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between JCPB and BYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JCPB vs. BYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JCPB
BYLD
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
JCPB
BYLD
-
Financial Services
JCPB
BYLD
-
Technology
JCPB
BYLD
-
Real Estate
JCPB
BYLD
Healthcare
JCPB
BYLD
-
Utilities
JCPB
BYLD
-
Energy
JCPB
BYLD
Consumer Cyclical
JCPB
BYLD
-
Industrials
JCPB
BYLD
-
Consumer Defensive
JCPB
BYLD
-
Basic Materials
JCPB
BYLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCPB vs. BYLD — Risk / Return Rank
JCPB
BYLD
JCPB vs. BYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCPB | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.60 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 10.54 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCPB | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.85 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.43 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
JCPB vs. BYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than BYLD's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and BYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCPB | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -14.75% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -2.71% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.97% | -3.94% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -14.65% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -0.34% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -2.51% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.67% | +0.22% |
Volatility
JCPB vs. BYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) is 1.26%, while iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that JCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCPB | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 1.42% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 2.94% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 3.82% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 5.20% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 5.43% | -0.38% |
JCPB vs. BYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BYLD's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCPB vs. BYLD - Dividend Comparison
JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than BYLD's 5.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 5.36% | 5.32% | 5.31% | 4.45% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 3.41% | 3.67% | 4.22% | 3.22% | 3.14% | 3.37% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.93% | 4.90% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.97% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCPB and BYLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYLD has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to JCPB (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs BYLD's -14.75%.
On 5-year performance, BYLD leads with 2.21% vs 1.11% for JCPB. On fees, BYLD is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BYLD has performed better with a 2.21% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BYLD is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.
BYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 4.93% for JCPB.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.17% for BYLD.
BYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JCPB and BYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer