PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCMAX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCMAX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class A (JCMAX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCMAX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than DNLDX's 11.73% return. Over the past 10 years, JCMAX has outperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 11.26%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


JCMAX

1D
0.46%
1M
1.94%
YTD
7.01%
6M
6.57%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
11.26%

DNLDX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.72%
YTD
11.73%
6M
12.09%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCMAX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JCMAX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class A
7.01%5.82%18.44%15.87%-16.24%19.67%22.33%32.37%-8.43%20.96%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
11.73%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between JCMAX and DNLDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.97

The correlation between JCMAX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCMAX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCMAX
JCMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
JCMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JCMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCMAX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class A (JCMAX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCMAXDNLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.05

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

11.45

-5.07

JCMAX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCMAX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCMAXDNLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.70

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.57

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.51

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.55

+0.12

Drawdowns

JCMAX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCMAX drawdown since its inception was -38.33%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCMAX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCMAXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.33%

-63.69%

+25.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-7.29%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.99%

-20.42%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-23.42%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.33%

-42.23%

+3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-9.63%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.94%

+0.27%

Volatility

JCMAX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class A (JCMAX) is 2.80%, while BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that JCMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCMAXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.36%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

9.55%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

13.10%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

18.48%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

19.51%

+0.10%

JCMAX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCMAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCMAX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

JCMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, less than DNLDX's 13.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.45%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%
JCMAX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class A
5.75%6.16%8.60%0.31%2.63%7.65%11.63%8.54%12.89%5.69%3.23%5.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JCMAX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DNLDX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to JCMAX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCMAX dropped -38.33% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCMAX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer