PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCBCX vs. JLGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCBCX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C (JCBCX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCBCX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than JLGMX's 7.21% return. Over the past 10 years, JCBCX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 0.93%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.08% annualized return.


JCBCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.81%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
0.93%

JLGMX

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.22%
YTD
7.21%
6M
5.36%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
20.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCBCX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JCBCX
JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C
0.70%2.85%0.87%4.30%-7.11%-0.68%3.42%5.13%0.66%2.97%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
7.21%14.38%35.40%34.95%-25.20%18.48%56.39%39.47%0.74%38.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JCBCX and JLGMX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2010

-0.05

The correlation between JCBCX and JLGMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCBCX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCBCX
JCBCX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
JCBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JCBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

JLGMX
JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCBCX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C (JCBCX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCBCXJLGMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.24

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.26

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

3.60

+2.54

JCBCX vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCBCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCBCX and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCBCXJLGMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.35

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.68

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.93

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.85

-0.12

Drawdowns

JCBCX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCBCX drawdown since its inception was -11.44%, smaller than the maximum JLGMX drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCBCX and JLGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCBCXJLGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-31.82%

+20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-16.73%

+14.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-21.47%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.28%

-31.13%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.44%

-31.82%

+20.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.70%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-5.81%

+3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

5.85%

-5.02%

Volatility

JCBCX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C (JCBCX) is 0.90%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that JCBCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCBCXJLGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

3.97%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

11.23%

-9.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

15.60%

-13.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.90%

20.18%

-17.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.28%

21.57%

-18.29%

JCBCX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCBCX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCBCX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

JCBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than JLGMX's 10.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCBCX
JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C
2.54%2.39%2.35%1.90%1.38%0.95%1.08%1.72%2.16%2.09%1.99%2.51%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
10.30%11.04%2.12%0.31%3.49%14.25%5.14%12.65%15.59%14.44%9.71%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCBCX and JLGMX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLGMX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to JCBCX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCBCX dropped -11.44% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

JCBCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCBCX and JLGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer