JCBCX vs. BATVX
JCBCX (JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C) and BATVX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, JCBCX returned 0.20%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for BATVX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JCBCX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BATVX.
Performance
JCBCX vs. BATVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCBCX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than BATVX's 0.97% return.
JCBCX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- 0.93%
BATVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
JCBCX vs. BATVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCBCX JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C | 0.70% | 2.85% | 0.87% | 4.30% | -7.11% | -0.02% |
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares | 0.97% | 2.80% | 2.48% | 1.41% | -0.10% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCBCX and BATVX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCBCX vs. BATVX — Risk / Return Rank
JCBCX
BATVX
JCBCX vs. BATVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C (JCBCX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCBCX | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCBCX | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 3.57 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 2.39 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 2.38 | -1.65 |
Drawdowns
JCBCX vs. BATVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCBCX drawdown since its inception was -11.44%, which is greater than BATVX's maximum drawdown of -0.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCBCX and BATVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCBCX | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.44% | -0.20% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | 0.00% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.77% | -0.10% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.28% | -0.20% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | 0.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -0.03% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 0.00% | +0.82% |
Volatility
JCBCX vs. BATVX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C (JCBCX) has a higher volatility of 0.90% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) at 0.20%. This indicates that JCBCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCBCX | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 0.20% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.67% | 0.49% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14% | 0.73% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.90% | 0.64% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 0.63% | +2.65% |
JCBCX vs. BATVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCBCX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BATVX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCBCX vs. BATVX - Dividend Comparison
JCBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, which matches BATVX's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares | 2.55% | 2.76% | 2.44% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JCBCX JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.35% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.95% | 1.08% | 1.72% | 2.16% | 2.09% | 1.99% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCBCX and BATVX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JCBCX has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to BATVX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCBCX dropped -11.44% vs BATVX's -0.20%.
BATVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JCBCX and BATVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer