PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JATTX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JATTX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JATTX achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's 18.61% return. Over the past 10 years, JATTX has underperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.


JATTX

1D
0.84%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
12.34%
6M
11.30%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
10.07%

VRTGX

1D
1.51%
1M
2.40%
YTD
18.61%
6M
16.09%
1Y
39.67%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JATTX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JATTX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T
12.34%9.54%10.30%14.52%-23.75%6.63%28.41%28.30%-5.25%26.90%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.61%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JATTX and VRTGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.95

The correlation between JATTX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JATTX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JATTX
JATTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JATTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JATTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
JATTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JATTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JATTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JATTX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JATTXVRTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.69

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

9.68

+0.02

JATTX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JATTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JATTX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JATTXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.86

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.25

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.52

+0.01

Drawdowns

JATTX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JATTX drawdown since its inception was -57.77%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JATTX and VRTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JATTXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.77%

-41.97%

-15.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-14.80%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.90%

-28.54%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.90%

-40.48%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.71%

-41.97%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-10.43%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

4.10%

-1.41%

Volatility

JATTX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) is 5.16%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that JATTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JATTXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

6.51%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

15.87%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

21.41%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

24.56%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

24.51%

-3.93%

JATTX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JATTX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

JATTX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

JATTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%, more than VRTGX's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JATTX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T
10.27%11.54%7.74%7.29%6.35%20.71%4.17%4.30%7.56%5.11%2.83%7.89%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.60%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JATTX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTGX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to JATTX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JATTX dropped -57.77% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JATTX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer