JARTX vs. JNGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX).
JARTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on May 1, 1997. JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998.
Performance
JARTX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JARTX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARTX Janus Henderson Forty Fund | -16.07% | 17.88% | 27.76% | 39.50% | -33.81% | 22.30% | 38.69% | 36.30% | 1.10% | 29.05% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | -10.63% | 25.00% | 32.34% | 55.33% | -37.63% | 17.53% | 51.18% | 45.15% | 0.92% | 44.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JARTX achieves a -16.07% return, which is significantly lower than JNGTX's -10.63% return. Over the past 10 years, JARTX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 13.90%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.93% annualized return.
JARTX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -16.07%
- 6M
- -15.92%
- 1Y
- 8.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
JNGTX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -9.83%
- 1Y
- 24.39%
- 3Y*
- 23.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 19.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JARTX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JARTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JARTX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank
JARTX
JNGTX
JARTX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JARTX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 0.94 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.45 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.27 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 4.38 | -3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JARTX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.94 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.40 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.82 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.43 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between JARTX and JNGTX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JARTX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison
JARTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.27%, more than JNGTX's 15.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARTX Janus Henderson Forty Fund | 16.27% | 13.65% | 11.51% | 9.10% | 0.06% | 10.26% | 8.38% | 7.05% | 8.95% | 14.50% | 6.57% | 15.93% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | 15.01% | 13.42% | 11.65% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 15.86% | 8.99% | 8.55% | 6.61% | 7.47% | 4.83% | 7.75% |
Drawdowns
JARTX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JARTX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JARTX and JNGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JARTX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -84.79% | +28.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.19% | -15.93% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.09% | -46.46% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.09% | -46.46% | +5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.19% | -15.93% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -40.47% | +23.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 4.62% | +0.91% |
Volatility
JARTX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) is 6.14%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that JARTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JARTX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 7.02% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 15.78% | -2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 25.25% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 26.24% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 24.37% | -3.04% |