PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JARTX vs. EFCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JARTX vs. EFCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JARTX having a 16.50% annualized return and EFCNX not far behind at 16.46%.


JARTX

1D
-0.52%
1M
7.14%
YTD
8.23%
6M
7.92%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
16.50%

EFCNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
16.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JARTX vs. EFCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
8.23%17.88%27.76%39.50%-33.81%22.30%38.69%36.30%1.10%29.05%
EFCNX
Emerald Insights Fund
0.00%28.71%25.88%40.82%-31.09%22.95%49.60%36.32%-9.88%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JARTX and EFCNX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2014

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between JARTX and EFCNX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JARTX vs. EFCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JARTX
JARTX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
JARTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JARTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JARTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JARTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
JARTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EFCNX
EFCNX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EFCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EFCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JARTX vs. EFCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JARTXEFCNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

3.86

-2.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

6.20

-4.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

2.65

-1.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

12.23

-10.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.62

70.23

-65.61

JARTX vs. EFCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JARTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the EFCNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JARTX and EFCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JARTXEFCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

3.86

-2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.50

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.74

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Drawdowns

JARTX vs. EFCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JARTX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than EFCNX's maximum drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JARTX and EFCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JARTXEFCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-38.34%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.19%

-2.90%

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-27.61%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.09%

-38.34%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.09%

-38.34%

-2.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-8.64%

-8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.88%

0.94%

+4.94%

Volatility

JARTX vs. EFCNX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX) at 0.00%. This indicates that JARTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JARTXEFCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

0.00%

+4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

0.00%

+13.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

9.27%

+8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.99%

22.89%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

22.80%

-1.35%

JARTX vs. EFCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JARTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EFCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

JARTX vs. EFCNX - Dividend Comparison

JARTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.61%, more than EFCNX's 8.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFCNX
Emerald Insights Fund
8.50%8.50%1.27%0.00%5.41%15.80%9.41%0.04%27.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
12.61%13.65%11.51%9.10%0.06%10.26%8.38%7.05%8.95%14.50%6.57%15.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


JARTX and EFCNX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JARTX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to EFCNX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JARTX dropped -56.70% vs EFCNX's -38.34%.

EFCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JARTX and EFCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer