JARI.L vs. VJPB.L
JARI.L (Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C)) and VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Amundi and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JARI.L returned 1.63%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for VJPB.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JARI.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPB.L.
Performance
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JARI.L is traded in GBp, while VJPB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VJPB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JARI.L achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than VJPB.L's 16.20% return.
JARI.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 12.60%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
VJPB.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- —
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARI.L Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) | 2.58% | 10.15% | -2.37% | 5.00% | -10.79% | -1.95% |
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 16.20% | 17.98% | 8.49% | 13.45% | -6.28% | -2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between JARI.L and VJPB.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between JARI.L and VJPB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Technology
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Consumer Cyclical
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Financial Services
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Healthcare
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Communication Services
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Consumer Defensive
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Real Estate
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Basic Materials
JARI.L
VJPB.L
Energy
JARI.L
-
VJPB.L
Utilities
JARI.L
-
VJPB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L — Risk / Return Rank
JARI.L
VJPB.L
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JARI.L | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 3.16 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 10.23 | -6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JARI.L | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.91 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.65 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.53 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JARI.L drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, smaller than the maximum VJPB.L drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JARI.L and VJPB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JARI.L | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -24.65% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -10.67% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.89% | -13.60% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.78% | -18.32% | -4.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -0.19% | -4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.30% | -5.34% | -6.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 3.31% | +0.49% |
Volatility
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) at 3.88%. This indicates that JARI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JARI.L | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 3.88% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 14.42% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 17.70% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 15.47% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 16.69% | +1.04% |
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JARI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VJPB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JARI.L vs. VJPB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JARI.L nor VJPB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JARI.L and VJPB.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VJPB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JARI.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JARI.L and 0.15% for VJPB.L.
Find the right allocation for JARI.L and VJPB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer