JARI.L vs. EEJG.L
JARI.L (Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C)) and EEJG.L (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Amundi and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JARI.L returned 1.63%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for EEJG.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JARI.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EEJG.L.
Performance
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JARI.L is traded in GBp, while EEJG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EEJG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JARI.L achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than EEJG.L's 15.84% return.
JARI.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 12.60%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
EEJG.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 15.60%
- 1Y
- 34.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- —
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARI.L Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) | 2.58% | 10.15% | -2.37% | 5.00% | -10.79% | -1.95% |
EEJG.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 15.84% | 17.60% | 6.43% | 13.48% | -8.04% | -2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between JARI.L and EEJG.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between JARI.L and EEJG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Technology
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Consumer Cyclical
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Financial Services
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Healthcare
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Communication Services
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Consumer Defensive
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Real Estate
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Basic Materials
JARI.L
EEJG.L
Energy
JARI.L
-
EEJG.L
Utilities
JARI.L
-
EEJG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L — Risk / Return Rank
JARI.L
EEJG.L
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JARI.L | EEJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 3.01 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 9.84 | -6.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JARI.L | EEJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.82 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.58 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.66 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JARI.L drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, which is greater than EEJG.L's maximum drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JARI.L and EEJG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JARI.L | EEJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -19.37% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -11.39% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.89% | -13.99% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.78% | -19.37% | -3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -0.30% | -4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.30% | -5.78% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 3.48% | +0.32% |
Volatility
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) have volatilities of 4.18% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JARI.L | EEJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 4.29% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 15.23% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 18.80% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 15.92% | +1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 15.99% | +1.74% |
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JARI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than EEJG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JARI.L vs. EEJG.L - Dividend Comparison
JARI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEJG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEJG.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.36% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.74% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 1.64% |
JARI.L Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JARI.L and EEJG.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEJG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEJG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JARI.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JARI.L and 0.15% for EEJG.L.
Find the right allocation for JARI.L and EEJG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer