JANW vs. JULQ
JANW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. JANW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULQ.
Performance
JANW vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JANW
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- —
JULQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANW vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JANW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | 3.78% |
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% |
JANW vs. JULQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JANW
JULQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
JANW
JULQ
Financial Services
JANW
JULQ
Communication Services
JANW
JULQ
Consumer Cyclical
JANW
JULQ
Healthcare
JANW
JULQ
Industrials
JANW
JULQ
Consumer Defensive
JANW
JULQ
Energy
JANW
JULQ
Utilities
JANW
JULQ
Real Estate
JANW
JULQ
Basic Materials
JANW
JULQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANW vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank
JANW
JULQ
JANW vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANW | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.89 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.35 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANW | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | — | — |
Drawdowns
JANW vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and JULQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANW | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | 0.00% | -9.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | 0.00% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility
JANW vs. JULQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANW | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 0.00% | +4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.77% | 0.00% | +6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 0.00% | +6.67% |
JANW vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANW vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither JANW nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, JANW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULQ.
JANW and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANW and 0.79% for JULQ.
Find the right allocation for JANW and JULQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer