PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANW vs. BBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANW vs. BBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly higher than BBDC's -2.86% return.


JANW

1D
0.18%
1M
0.23%
YTD
4.00%
6M
4.45%
1Y
12.31%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*

BBDC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
-1.25%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANW vs. BBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JANW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF
4.00%10.05%10.99%14.56%-0.60%6.31%
BBDC
Barings BDC, Inc.
-2.86%8.84%23.86%18.53%-18.59%29.31%

Correlation

The correlation between JANW and BBDC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANW vs. BBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANW
JANW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BBDC
BBDC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANW vs. BBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANWBBDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.05

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

0.33

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.55

0.73

+16.82

JANW vs. BBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANW Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the BBDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANW and BBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANW vs. BBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum BBDC drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and BBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANWBBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-48.45%

+38.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-12.28%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.66%

-24.51%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.69%

-27.55%

+17.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-6.42%

+5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-7.98%

+6.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

5.59%

-4.92%

Volatility

JANW vs. BBDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) is 1.31%, while Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that JANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANWBBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

6.34%

-5.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

15.12%

-11.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

18.60%

-13.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.79%

19.39%

-12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

24.21%

-17.54%

Dividends

JANW vs. BBDC - Dividend Comparison

JANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBDC
Barings BDC, Inc.
12.99%12.96%10.87%11.89%11.66%7.44%7.07%5.25%21.24%
JANW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANW and BBDC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBDC has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to JANW (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs BBDC's -48.45%.

JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANW and BBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer