PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANW vs. APRQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANW vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JANW

1D
0.08%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.51%
6M
5.31%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*

APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANW vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


JANW vs. APRQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JANW
APRQ

Technology

36.2%
32.0%

Financial Services

11.9%
13.7%

Communication Services

10.9%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
10.5%

Industrials

8.1%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.2%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

JANW
36.2%
APRQ
32.0%

Financial Services

JANW
11.9%
APRQ
13.7%

Communication Services

JANW
10.9%
APRQ
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JANW
10.1%
APRQ
11.6%

Healthcare

JANW
8.4%
APRQ
10.5%

Industrials

JANW
8.1%
APRQ
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

JANW
4.9%
APRQ
5.5%

Energy

JANW
3.5%
APRQ
3.2%

Utilities

JANW
2.3%
APRQ
2.5%

Real Estate

JANW
1.9%
APRQ
2.1%

Basic Materials

JANW
1.8%
APRQ
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANW vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANW
JANW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

APRQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANW vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANWAPRQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.47

JANW vs. APRQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANWAPRQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

Drawdowns

JANW vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and APRQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANWAPRQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

0.00%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

0.00%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

Volatility

JANW vs. APRQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANWAPRQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.60%

0.00%

+4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

0.00%

+6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

0.00%

+6.67%

JANW vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANW vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANW nor APRQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, JANW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRQ.

JANW and APRQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANW and 0.79% for APRQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANW and APRQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer