PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANJ vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANJ vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANJ achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 6.27% return.


JANJ

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.74%
YTD
2.40%
6M
2.68%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRW

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.28%
YTD
6.27%
6M
7.02%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANJ vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANJ and APRW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024

0.66

The correlation between JANJ and APRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANJ vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANJ
JANJ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JANJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JANJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANJ vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANJAPRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

4.83

-2.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.77

8.87

-5.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

2.23

-0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

16.82

-13.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.10

86.04

-65.95

JANJ vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANJ and APRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANJAPRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

4.83

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.15

+0.10

Drawdowns

JANJ vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANJ drawdown since its inception was -5.75%, smaller than the maximum APRW drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANJ and APRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANJAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-9.61%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-0.75%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.09%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-1.12%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.15%

+0.14%

Volatility

JANJ vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January (JANJ) is 0.32%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) has a volatility of 0.60%. This indicates that JANJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANJAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

0.60%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.43%

1.84%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

2.62%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

6.72%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

6.41%

-1.86%

JANJ vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRW's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANJ vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

JANJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, while APRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%
JANJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January
5.00%5.07%5.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANJ and APRW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APRW has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to JANJ (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANJ dropped -5.75% vs APRW's -9.61%.

On 1-year performance, APRW leads with 12.59% vs 5.91% for JANJ. On fees, APRW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, JANJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APRW has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANJ.

JANJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 0.00% for APRW.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANJ and 0.74% for APRW.

APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANJ and APRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer