PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANIX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANIX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANIX achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's 18.46% return. Over the past 10 years, JANIX has underperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 10.20%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.


JANIX

1D
0.03%
1M
2.30%
YTD
11.41%
6M
11.11%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
10.20%

VRTGX

1D
0.86%
1M
5.85%
YTD
18.46%
6M
16.83%
1Y
39.45%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANIX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JANIX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund
11.41%9.66%10.40%14.68%-23.65%6.76%28.56%28.42%-5.15%27.01%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.46%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JANIX and VRTGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.95

The correlation between JANIX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANIX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANIX
JANIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JANIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JANIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANIX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANIXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.96

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.68

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.83

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.00

10.20

-0.20

JANIX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANIX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANIXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.96

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.25

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.52

-0.03

Drawdowns

JANIX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANIX drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANIX and VRTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANIXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.76%

-41.97%

-20.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-14.80%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

-28.54%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.80%

-40.48%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.70%

-41.97%

+2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.02%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-10.44%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

4.10%

-1.42%

Volatility

JANIX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX) is 5.24%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that JANIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANIXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.44%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

15.87%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

21.37%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

24.55%

-4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

24.51%

-3.92%

JANIX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANIX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

JANIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, more than VRTGX's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JANIX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund
10.08%11.23%7.57%7.15%6.24%20.40%4.12%4.26%7.50%5.08%2.74%7.76%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.60%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JANIX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTGX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to JANIX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANIX dropped -62.76% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANIX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer