PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMVX vs. JARTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMVX vs. JARTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) and Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMVX achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than JARTX's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, JAMVX has underperformed JARTX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while JARTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.50% annualized return.


JAMVX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
9.85%
6M
11.08%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
8.97%

JARTX

1D
-0.52%
1M
7.14%
YTD
8.23%
6M
7.92%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
16.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAMVX vs. JARTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAMVX
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio
9.85%6.55%13.06%11.41%-5.51%19.72%-1.08%30.39%-13.59%13.98%
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
8.23%17.88%27.76%39.50%-33.81%22.30%38.69%36.30%1.10%29.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMVX and JARTX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2000

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between JAMVX and JARTX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMVX vs. JARTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAMVX
JAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
JAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

JARTX
JARTX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
JARTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JARTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JARTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JARTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
JARTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAMVX vs. JARTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) and Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAMVXJARTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

1.56

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

2.14

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.42

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.49

4.62

+3.87

JAMVX vs. JARTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the JARTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMVX and JARTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAMVXJARTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.56

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.52

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.77

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.59

-0.11

Drawdowns

JAMVX vs. JARTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMVX drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, smaller than the maximum JARTX drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMVX and JARTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMVXJARTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-56.70%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-19.19%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.83%

-22.22%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-41.09%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-41.09%

+1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-0.52%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-16.84%

+10.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

5.88%

-3.58%

Volatility

JAMVX vs. JARTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) is 3.56%, while Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that JAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JARTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMVXJARTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

4.46%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

13.43%

-3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

17.41%

-4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

21.99%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

21.45%

-3.50%

JAMVX vs. JARTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMVX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than JARTX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMVX vs. JARTX - Dividend Comparison

JAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.88%, less than JARTX's 12.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAMVX
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio
9.88%10.85%6.16%3.67%9.77%0.43%2.85%8.72%12.17%4.32%14.88%12.31%
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
12.61%13.65%11.51%9.10%0.06%10.26%8.38%7.05%8.95%14.50%6.57%15.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAMVX and JARTX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JARTX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to JAMVX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMVX dropped -46.19% vs JARTX's -56.70%.

JARTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMVX and JARTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer