PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMVX vs. FIMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMVX vs. FIMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMVX achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than FIMVX's 15.21% return.


JAMVX

1D
1.13%
1M
0.71%
YTD
11.09%
6M
11.39%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
9.09%

FIMVX

1D
0.95%
1M
3.80%
YTD
15.21%
6M
15.28%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAMVX vs. FIMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JAMVX
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio
11.09%6.55%13.06%11.41%-5.51%19.72%-1.08%8.70%
FIMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund
15.21%11.01%13.02%12.75%-12.08%28.21%4.74%7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMVX and FIMVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.97

The correlation between JAMVX and FIMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMVX vs. FIMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAMVX
JAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FIMVX
FIMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FIMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FIMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAMVX vs. FIMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAMVXFIMVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.17

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

3.09

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.79

-1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.20

14.28

-5.07

JAMVX vs. FIMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FIMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMVX and FIMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAMVXFIMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.17

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.50

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.51

-0.03

Drawdowns

JAMVX vs. FIMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMVX drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, which is greater than FIMVX's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMVX and FIMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMVXFIMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-43.61%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-7.52%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.83%

-20.40%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-21.23%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

0.00%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-6.43%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.00%

+0.30%

Volatility

JAMVX vs. FIMVX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio (JAMVX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) at 3.45%. This indicates that JAMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMVXFIMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.45%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

9.56%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

13.16%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

17.32%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

21.84%

-3.89%

JAMVX vs. FIMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMVX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FIMVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMVX vs. FIMVX - Dividend Comparison

JAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.77%, more than FIMVX's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund
2.15%2.48%4.44%1.89%2.75%5.62%1.23%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JAMVX
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Portfolio
9.77%10.85%6.16%3.67%9.77%0.43%2.85%8.72%12.17%4.32%14.88%12.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JAMVX and FIMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JAMVX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to FIMVX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMVX dropped -46.19% vs FIMVX's -43.61%.

FIMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMVX and FIMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer