JAGRX vs. JNGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Research Portfolio (JAGRX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX).
JAGRX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 13, 1993. JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998.
Performance
JAGRX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JAGRX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAGRX Janus Henderson VIT Research Portfolio | -10.66% | 18.43% | 35.33% | 43.17% | -29.45% | 20.41% | 32.28% | 35.60% | -2.58% | 27.90% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | -5.22% | 25.00% | 32.34% | 55.33% | -37.63% | 17.53% | 51.18% | 45.15% | 0.92% | 44.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAGRX achieves a -10.66% return, which is significantly lower than JNGTX's -5.22% return. Over the past 10 years, JAGRX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 14.71%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.64% annualized return.
JAGRX
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -10.66%
- 6M
- -10.22%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
JNGTX
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -5.40%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 25.79%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 20.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JAGRX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAGRX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JAGRX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank
JAGRX
JNGTX
JAGRX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Research Portfolio (JAGRX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAGRX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.19 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.77 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 2.00 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 6.74 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAGRX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.19 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.43 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.85 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.44 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between JAGRX and JNGTX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JAGRX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison
JAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, less than JNGTX's 14.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAGRX Janus Henderson VIT Research Portfolio | 8.29% | 7.41% | 2.63% | 0.12% | 24.98% | 4.91% | 7.66% | 10.73% | 6.12% | 1.23% | 6.99% | 22.73% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | 14.16% | 13.42% | 11.65% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 15.86% | 8.99% | 8.55% | 6.61% | 7.47% | 4.83% | 7.75% |
Drawdowns
JAGRX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAGRX drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAGRX and JNGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAGRX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -84.79% | +21.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.07% | -15.93% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.99% | -46.46% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.99% | -46.46% | +10.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.86% | -10.85% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.47% | -40.46% | +21.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 4.74% | +0.05% |
Volatility
JAGRX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Research Portfolio (JAGRX) is 7.07%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that JAGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JAGRX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 8.21% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 16.39% | -3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 25.56% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 26.27% | -4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 24.40% | -3.14% |