PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JACSX vs. FWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JACSX vs. FWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund (JACSX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JACSX achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than FWLSX's 14.17% return.


JACSX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.16%
YTD
12.35%
6M
13.04%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*

FWLSX

1D
0.65%
1M
5.45%
YTD
14.17%
6M
15.72%
1Y
31.28%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JACSX vs. FWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JACSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund
12.35%20.13%12.10%21.87%-17.61%17.49%12.82%24.42%-8.17%9.46%
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
14.17%22.76%17.95%21.00%-18.55%16.88%18.48%25.96%-8.33%10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between JACSX and FWLSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.98

The correlation between JACSX and FWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JACSX vs. FWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JACSX
JACSX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JACSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JACSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JACSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JACSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JACSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FWLSX
FWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JACSX vs. FWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund (JACSX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JACSXFWLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.36

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.03

14.85

-0.82

JACSX vs. FWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JACSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the FWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JACSX and FWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JACSXFWLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.53

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.75

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.78

-0.06

Drawdowns

JACSX vs. FWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JACSX drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, roughly equal to the maximum FWLSX drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACSX and FWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JACSXFWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.59%

-31.32%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-9.49%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.32%

-15.38%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.29%

-27.40%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.43%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.14%

-0.12%

Volatility

JACSX vs. FWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund (JACSX) is 3.68%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that JACSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JACSXFWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

4.12%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

10.31%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

12.59%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

15.10%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

16.06%

-0.28%

JACSX vs. FWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JACSX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FWLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JACSX vs. FWLSX - Dividend Comparison

JACSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than FWLSX's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
4.02%3.14%7.07%2.36%5.59%9.05%5.80%7.02%8.16%3.09%
JACSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund
1.99%2.23%2.00%1.72%1.73%4.37%1.21%2.03%3.16%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JACSX and FWLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWLSX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to JACSX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JACSX dropped -32.59% vs FWLSX's -31.32%.

FWLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JACSX and FWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer