PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAAA vs. FUMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAAA vs. FUMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly higher than FUMB's 1.15% return.


JAAA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.47%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*

FUMB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.33%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAAA vs. FUMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
1.89%5.16%7.43%8.59%0.49%1.39%0.79%
FUMB
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
1.15%2.78%3.05%2.84%-0.03%0.38%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAA and FUMB is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020

0.02

The correlation between JAAA and FUMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAAA vs. FUMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FUMB
FUMB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FUMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAAA vs. FUMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAAAFUMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.71

1.78

+0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.18

12.05

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

70.92

45.71

+25.22

JAAA vs. FUMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAAA Sharpe Ratio is 6.04, which is higher than the FUMB Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAA and FUMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAAAFUMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04

3.46

+2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.87

1.71

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.78

1.01

+1.77

Drawdowns

JAAA vs. FUMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FUMB drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and FUMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAAAFUMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-2.68%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.39%

-0.22%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

-0.60%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.64%

-1.25%

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-0.19%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.06%

+0.01%

Volatility

JAAA vs. FUMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) is 0.13%, while First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB) has a volatility of 0.20%. This indicates that JAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAAAFUMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.20%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.64%

0.54%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85%

0.76%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.68%

1.16%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.64%

1.77%

-0.13%

JAAA vs. FUMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FUMB's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAAA vs. FUMB - Dividend Comparison

JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than FUMB's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FUMB
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
2.80%2.90%2.86%2.24%1.02%0.43%0.94%1.74%0.15%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
5.00%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAAA and FUMB have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUMB has higher volatility (0.20%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAA dropped -2.64% vs FUMB's -2.68%.

On 5-year performance, JAAA leads with 4.79% vs 1.98% for FUMB. On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JAAA has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 1.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FUMB.

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 2.80% for FUMB.

JAAA is categorized as CLO, while FUMB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JAAA and 0.45% for FUMB.

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.04 vs 3.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAAA and FUMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer