JA vs. PCLO
JA (Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF) and PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.
Performance
JA vs. PCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JA vs. PCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JA Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF | 1.64% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between JA and PCLO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JA vs. PCLO — Risk / Return Rank
JA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PCLO
JA vs. PCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF (JA) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JA | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.67 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 19.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 116.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JA vs. PCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JA drawdown since its inception was -0.51%, smaller than the maximum PCLO drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JA and PCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JA | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -0.76% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.03% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
JA vs. PCLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JA | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52% | 0.91% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.52% | 1.14% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.52% | 1.14% | +0.38% |
JA vs. PCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JA and PCLO have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Dividends
JA vs. PCLO - Dividend Comparison
JA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than PCLO's 5.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JA Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 5.24% | 5.53% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JA and PCLO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JA and PCLO have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.
PCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 1.28% for JA.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Virtus.
Find the right allocation for JA and PCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer