PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Japan ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF EUR (J1GR.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (LEAD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, J1GR.DE achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly higher than LEAD.DE's 9.44% return.


J1GR.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.23%
YTD
16.49%
6M
16.45%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
8.57%

LEAD.DE

1D
0.54%
1M
2.53%
YTD
9.44%
6M
11.63%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
J1GR.DE
Amundi MSCI Japan ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF EUR
16.49%11.73%11.30%14.89%-12.68%9.69%0.93%
LEAD.DE
Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc
9.44%13.89%6.93%16.25%-11.84%24.71%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between J1GR.DE and LEAD.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2020

0.56

The correlation between J1GR.DE and LEAD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

J1GR.DE
J1GR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
J1GR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J1GR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
J1GR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
J1GR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
J1GR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

LEAD.DE
LEAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LEAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF EUR (J1GR.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (LEAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


J1GR.DELEAD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

1.61

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

6.00

+2.78

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current J1GR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the LEAD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of J1GR.DE and LEAD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


J1GR.DELEAD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.22

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.72

-0.26

Drawdowns

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum J1GR.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.81%, which is greater than LEAD.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for J1GR.DE and LEAD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


J1GR.DELEAD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.81%

-21.53%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-10.43%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.22%

-16.59%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-21.53%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.11%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-4.13%

-3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.81%

+0.59%

Volatility

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Japan ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF EUR (J1GR.DE) is 4.06%, while Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (LEAD.DE) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that J1GR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


J1GR.DELEAD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

4.67%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

11.36%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

13.78%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

14.65%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

14.47%

+1.96%

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

J1GR.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LEAD.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

J1GR.DE vs. LEAD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither J1GR.DE nor LEAD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


J1GR.DE and LEAD.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LEAD.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LEAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for J1GR.DE.

J1GR.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while LEAD.DE is Europe Equities. J1GR.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Broad CTB Select, while LEAD.DE tracks MSCI Europe ESG Leaders. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for J1GR.DE and 0.20% for LEAD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for J1GR.DE and LEAD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer