PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
J15R.L vs. VECP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

J15R.L vs. VECP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (J15R.L) and Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VECP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, J15R.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than VECP.L's -0.48% return.


J15R.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.89%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
-0.43%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*

VECP.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.02%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

J15R.L vs. VECP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
J15R.L
JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
-0.52%8.88%-0.40%4.16%-2.63%-6.93%6.49%-3.37%0.59%
VECP.L
Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
-0.48%8.47%0.17%6.15%-7.51%-7.24%8.80%0.94%0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between J15R.L and VECP.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2018

0.92

The correlation between J15R.L and VECP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

J15R.L vs. VECP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

J15R.L
J15R.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
J15R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J15R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
J15R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
J15R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
J15R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VECP.L
VECP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VECP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VECP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
VECP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VECP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VECP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

J15R.L vs. VECP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (J15R.L) and Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VECP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


J15R.LVECP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.21

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

3.08

+0.63

J15R.L vs. VECP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current J15R.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the VECP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of J15R.L and VECP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


J15R.LVECP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.97

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.12

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.33

-0.22

Drawdowns

J15R.L vs. VECP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum J15R.L drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, smaller than the maximum VECP.L drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for J15R.L and VECP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


J15R.LVECP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-20.56%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-3.86%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.35%

-3.86%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.32%

-16.13%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-3.44%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-7.60%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.52%

-0.21%

Volatility

J15R.L vs. VECP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (J15R.L) is 1.27%, while Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VECP.L) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that J15R.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VECP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


J15R.LVECP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

1.45%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

3.64%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

4.82%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.47%

6.17%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.42%

7.58%

-1.16%

J15R.L vs. VECP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

J15R.L has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VECP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

J15R.L vs. VECP.L - Dividend Comparison

J15R.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VECP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
J15R.L
JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VECP.L
Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
3.42%3.37%4.05%3.45%2.12%0.94%0.99%0.93%1.10%1.23%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, J15R.L and VECP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, J15R.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

J15R.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VECP.L.

J15R.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while VECP.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for J15R.L and 0.09% for VECP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for J15R.L and VECP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer