PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
J13U.L vs. TIGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc) (J13U.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

J13U.L is traded in GBP, while TIGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TIGB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, J13U.L achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than TIGB.L's 1.42% return.


J13U.L

1D
0.08%
1M
1.09%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.21%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
1.44%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*

TIGB.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
J13U.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc)
0.63%-1.99%5.72%-1.65%9.27%
TIGB.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
1.42%4.10%4.94%4.27%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between J13U.L and TIGB.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2022

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

J13U.L
J13U.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
J13U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J13U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
J13U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
J13U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
J13U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

TIGB.L
TIGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TIGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc) (J13U.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


J13U.LTIGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

2.34

-1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

12.51

-11.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

73.64

-71.23

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current J13U.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the TIGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of J13U.L and TIGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


J13U.LTIGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

3.87

-3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

5.48

-5.22

Drawdowns

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum J13U.L drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, which is greater than TIGB.L's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for J13U.L and TIGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


J13U.LTIGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-0.50%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-0.30%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.92%

-0.30%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.77%

0.00%

-7.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-0.03%

-9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

0.05%

+1.75%

Volatility

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc) (J13U.L) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L) at 0.45%. This indicates that J13U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


J13U.LTIGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

0.45%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.51%

0.71%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.15%

0.97%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

0.74%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

0.74%

+7.83%

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

J13U.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TIGB.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

J13U.L vs. TIGB.L - Dividend Comparison

J13U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
J13U.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.18%
TIGB.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
3.92%4.11%4.93%4.53%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


J13U.L and TIGB.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, J13U.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

J13U.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TIGB.L.

J13U.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while TIGB.L is Short-Term Bond. J13U.L tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond US 1-3 Index, while TIGB.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for J13U.L and 0.10% for TIGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for J13U.L and TIGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer