PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
J13E.L vs. XGLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (J13E.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

J13E.L is traded in GBP, while XGLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, J13E.L achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than XGLE.L's -0.67% return.


J13E.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.55%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
-0.76%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
2.73%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*

XGLE.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.83%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
-0.96%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
2.50%
5Y*
-2.15%
10Y*
0.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
J13E.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-0.90%7.65%-1.69%1.45%0.25%-7.21%5.47%-4.60%1.22%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.68%5.95%-2.94%4.66%-14.01%-9.34%10.68%0.57%3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between J13E.L and XGLE.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018

0.68

The correlation between J13E.L and XGLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

J13E.L
J13E.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
J13E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J13E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
J13E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
J13E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
J13E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

XGLE.L
XGLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (J13E.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


J13E.LXGLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.08

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.58

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

1.30

+1.58

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current J13E.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of J13E.L and XGLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


J13E.LXGLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.47

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.29

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.24

-0.22

Drawdowns

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum J13E.L drawdown since its inception was -13.59%, smaller than the maximum XGLE.L drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for J13E.L and XGLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


J13E.LXGLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.59%

-26.78%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-4.53%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.14%

-6.20%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-20.99%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-18.89%

+14.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-10.13%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

2.04%

-0.81%

Volatility

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (J13E.L) is 1.24%, while Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that J13E.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


J13E.LXGLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

2.02%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

4.33%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

5.58%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.31%

7.50%

-2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

8.54%

-2.26%

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

J13E.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XGLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

J13E.L vs. XGLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither J13E.L nor XGLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
J13E.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


J13E.L and XGLE.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, J13E.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

J13E.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XGLE.L.

J13E.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for J13E.L and 0.15% for XGLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for J13E.L and XGLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer