PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYZ vs. RNWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYZ vs. RNWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYZ achieves a 28.55% return, which is significantly higher than RNWZ's 14.86% return.


IYZ

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.50%
YTD
28.55%
6M
31.94%
1Y
57.01%
3Y*
27.64%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
5.71%

RNWZ

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.46%
YTD
14.86%
6M
16.07%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYZ vs. RNWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
28.55%29.28%20.53%3.90%-1.48%
RNWZ
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
14.86%36.33%-7.36%-3.89%-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IYZ and RNWZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2022

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYZ vs. RNWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYZ
IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RNWZ
RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYZ vs. RNWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYZRNWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.39

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.65

4.80

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.10

12.78

+13.32

IYZ vs. RNWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is higher than the RNWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYZ and RNWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYZ vs. RNWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYZ drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than RNWZ's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYZ and RNWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYZRNWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-24.90%

-52.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-7.07%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-24.74%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.52%

-5.63%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-7.17%

-32.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.65%

-0.46%

Volatility

IYZ vs. RNWZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) at 5.01%. This indicates that IYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYZRNWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

5.01%

+3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

12.11%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.64%

15.24%

+3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

16.97%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.31%

16.97%

+2.34%

IYZ vs. RNWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than RNWZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYZ vs. RNWZ - Dividend Comparison

IYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than RNWZ's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
1.91%2.04%1.94%2.27%2.55%2.51%2.60%2.36%2.15%3.54%2.27%1.98%
RNWZ
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
1.95%2.12%2.36%3.87%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYZ and RNWZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYZ has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to RNWZ (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYZ dropped -77.11% vs RNWZ's -24.90%.

On 3-year performance, IYZ leads with 27.64% vs 10.78% for RNWZ. On fees, IYZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, RNWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IYZ has performed better with a 27.64% return vs 10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNWZ.

RNWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.91% for IYZ.

IYZ is categorized as Communications Equities, while RNWZ is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYZ and 0.75% for RNWZ.

IYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYZ and RNWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer