IXC vs. VTV
IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 9.93%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for VTV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
IXC vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 28.81% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 13.24% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 9.93%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.
IXC
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 28.81%
- 6M
- 27.41%
- 1Y
- 39.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
VTV
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
IXC vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 28.81% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 13.24% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and VTV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IXC and VTV has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IXC vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXC
VTV
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IXC
VTV
Basic Materials
IXC
-
VTV
Communication Services
IXC
-
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
IXC
-
VTV
Consumer Defensive
IXC
-
VTV
Financial Services
IXC
-
VTV
Healthcare
IXC
-
VTV
Industrials
IXC
-
VTV
Real Estate
IXC
-
VTV
Technology
IXC
-
VTV
Utilities
IXC
-
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
VTV
IXC vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 4.18 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 15.75 | -3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXC vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -59.27% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -6.35% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -14.52% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -17.04% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | -36.78% | -27.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | 0.00% | -7.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -7.86% | -9.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 1.68% | +1.67% |
Volatility
IXC vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.25%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 3.25% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.64% | 7.88% | +7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 10.34% | +8.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 13.92% | +9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 16.68% | +10.16% |
IXC vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXC vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than VTV's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.86% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXC and VTV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to VTV (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.64% vs 9.93% for IXC. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.
IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXC and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer