PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXC vs. VSDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXC vs. VSDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 32.22% return, which is significantly higher than VSDB's 0.94% return.


IXC

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
32.22%
6M
30.00%
1Y
48.10%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
19.64%
10Y*
10.29%

VSDB

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.94%
6M
1.35%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. VSDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IXC and VSDB is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXC vs. VSDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VSDB
VSDB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VSDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. VSDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXCVSDBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.63

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

3.72

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

16.38

-1.28

IXC vs. VSDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the VSDB Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and VSDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXCVSDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

3.04

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

2.65

-2.33

Drawdowns

IXC vs. VSDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than VSDB's maximum drawdown of -1.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and VSDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXCVSDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-1.42%

-66.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-1.42%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-0.16%

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.48%

-0.19%

-17.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

0.32%

+2.88%

Volatility

IXC vs. VSDB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB) at 0.55%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXCVSDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

0.55%

+6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

1.35%

+14.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

1.75%

+17.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.50%

1.90%

+21.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

1.90%

+24.95%

IXC vs. VSDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VSDB's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXC vs. VSDB - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than VSDB's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.79%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
VSDB
Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares
4.17%3.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXC and VSDB have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to VSDB (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs VSDB's -1.42%.

On 1-year performance, IXC leads with 48.10% vs 5.27% for VSDB. On fees, VSDB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VSDB has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IXC has performed better with a 48.10% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSDB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.

VSDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 2.79% for IXC.

IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while VSDB is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXC and 0.15% for VSDB.

VSDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and VSDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer