IXC vs. RAYS
IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while RAYS is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Solar Index. Both are passively managed. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RAYS.
Performance
IXC vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IXC
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 13.16%
- 6M
- 19.17%
- YTD
- 34.71%
- 1Y
- 45.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 22.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.52%
RAYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.96M | $62.51M | $57.88M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
IXC vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 17.73% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% |
IXC vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXC
RAYS
Energy
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
IXC
RAYS
-
Utilities
IXC
RAYS
Basic Materials
IXC
-
RAYS
Communication Services
IXC
-
RAYS
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXC
-
RAYS
Consumer Defensive
IXC
-
RAYS
-
Financial Services
IXC
-
RAYS
-
Healthcare
IXC
-
RAYS
-
Industrials
IXC
-
RAYS
Real Estate
IXC
-
RAYS
-
Technology
IXC
-
RAYS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
RAYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXC vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXC | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXC vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and RAYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | 0.00% | -67.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | 0.00% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.42% | 0.00% | -17.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | — | — |
Volatility
IXC vs. RAYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.61% | 0.00% | +19.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 0.00% | +23.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 0.00% | +26.82% |
IXC vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXC vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.82% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.
IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while RAYS is Alternative Energy Equities. IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.50% for RAYS.
Find the right allocation for IXC and RAYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer