PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXC vs. RAYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXC vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IXC

1D
0.63%
1M
13.16%
6M
19.17%
YTD
34.71%
1Y
45.16%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
22.34%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.52%

RAYS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.96M$62.51M$57.88M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IXC vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


IXC vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXC
RAYS

Energy

99.5%

-

Utilities

0.2%
6.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

21.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

66.9%

Energy

IXC
99.5%
RAYS

-

Utilities

IXC
0.2%
RAYS
6.8%

Basic Materials

IXC

-

RAYS
0.9%

Communication Services

IXC

-

RAYS

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

RAYS
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

RAYS

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

RAYS

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

RAYS

-

Industrials

IXC

-

RAYS
21.4%

Real Estate

IXC

-

RAYS

-

Technology

IXC

-

RAYS
66.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXC vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

RAYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IXC vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXCRAYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

IXC vs. RAYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXC vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and RAYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXCRAYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

0.00%

-67.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

0.00%

-3.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

0.00%

-17.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

Volatility

IXC vs. RAYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXCRAYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

0.00%

+19.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

0.00%

+23.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.82%

0.00%

+26.82%

IXC vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXC vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.82%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.

IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while RAYS is Alternative Energy Equities. IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.50% for RAYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and RAYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer