IXC vs. ENGW.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L).
IXC and ENGW.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2001. ENGW.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. Both IXC and ENGW.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IXC vs. ENGW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IXC vs. ENGW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 37.40% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 11.50% |
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF | 38.45% | 15.28% | 1.82% | 3.10% | 11.20% |
Different Trading Currencies
IXC is traded in USD, while ENGW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IXC having a 37.40% return and ENGW.L slightly higher at 38.45%.
IXC
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 11.19%
- YTD
- 37.40%
- 6M
- 40.78%
- 1Y
- 42.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
ENGW.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 14.12%
- YTD
- 38.45%
- 6M
- 42.55%
- 1Y
- 43.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IXC vs. ENGW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ENGW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. ENGW.L — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
ENGW.L
IXC vs. ENGW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXC | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 2.08 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 2.55 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 2.36 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 8.20 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXC | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.08 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.73 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and ENGW.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IXC vs. ENGW.L - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while ENGW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.68% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IXC vs. ENGW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than ENGW.L's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and ENGW.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -21.65% | -46.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.03% | -17.60% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.51% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.57% | -8.75% | -8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 6.76% | -1.35% |
Volatility
IXC vs. ENGW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is 4.41%, while SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that IXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 6.22% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 12.89% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.29% | 20.71% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 23.27% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 23.27% | +3.51% |