IXC vs. DIVO
IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. IXC is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IXC returned 19.14%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for DIVO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
IXC vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 29.17% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 6.43% return.
IXC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 29.17%
- 6M
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
DIVO
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- —
IXC vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.17% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and DIVO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IXC and DIVO has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IXC vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXC
DIVO
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IXC
DIVO
Basic Materials
IXC
-
DIVO
Communication Services
IXC
-
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
IXC
-
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
IXC
-
DIVO
Financial Services
IXC
-
DIVO
Healthcare
IXC
-
DIVO
Industrials
IXC
-
DIVO
Real Estate
IXC
-
DIVO
-
Technology
IXC
-
DIVO
Utilities
IXC
-
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
DIVO
IXC vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXC | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 3.12 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 11.23 | +0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXC vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -30.04% | -37.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -5.95% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -12.12% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -13.72% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.04% | -0.19% | -6.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -2.61% | -14.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 1.65% | +1.73% |
Volatility
IXC vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.71%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 2.71% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 7.13% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 9.20% | +9.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 11.97% | +11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 14.83% | +12.01% |
IXC vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXC vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than DIVO's 6.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.36% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.85% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXC and DIVO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to DIVO (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, IXC leads with 19.14% vs 10.91% for DIVO. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IXC has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.36%, compared with 2.85% for IXC.
IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.56% for DIVO.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXC and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer