IXC vs. BSMW
IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IXC returned 16.38%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
IXC vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 22.29% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.38% return.
IXC
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- 22.29%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 17.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
BSMW
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 2.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 22.29% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 5.99% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.38% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and BSMW is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2023 | -0.11 |
The correlation between IXC and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
BSMW
IXC vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXC | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.47 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 2.13 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.40 | 6.54 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXC vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -7.57% | -60.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -2.92% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -7.34% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.99% | -0.90% | -11.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.46% | -1.71% | -15.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 0.95% | +2.85% |
Volatility
IXC vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.48%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 0.48% | +6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.76% | 1.95% | +13.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 2.68% | +16.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 4.96% | +18.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.83% | 4.96% | +21.87% |
IXC vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXC vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than BSMW's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.11% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXC and BSMW have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to BSMW (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs BSMW's -7.57%.
On 3-year performance, IXC leads with 16.38% vs 2.88% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IXC has performed better with a 16.38% return vs 2.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 3.11% for IXC.
IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.18% for BSMW.
BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXC and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer