PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVU.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVU.L achieves a 28.22% return, which is significantly lower than HKOD.L's 70.37% return.


IWVU.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
-4.95%
6M
24.05%
YTD
28.22%
1Y
55.13%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*

HKOD.L

1D
-1.67%
1M
-20.60%
6M
52.67%
YTD
70.37%
1Y
138.83%
3Y*
37.85%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
14.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWVU.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
28.22%40.59%4.85%19.74%-9.88%20.13%-3.59%18.01%-15.78%
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF
70.37%99.54%-22.90%19.95%-28.44%-8.49%45.08%10.64%-19.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVU.L and HKOD.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018

0.64

The correlation between IWVU.L and HKOD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWVU.L
IWVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IWVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HKOD.L
HKOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVU.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWVU.LHKOD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.45

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.52

5.77

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.24

17.93

+4.32

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVU.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVU.L and HKOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.21%, smaller than the maximum HKOD.L drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVU.L and HKOD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWVU.LHKOD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.21%

-50.54%

+14.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-24.00%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-29.48%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-47.65%

+21.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-24.00%

+18.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-18.79%

+12.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

7.75%

-5.23%

Volatility

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVU.L) is 6.26%, while HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that IWVU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWVU.LHKOD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

20.20%

-13.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

41.23%

-26.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.06%

45.10%

-28.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

29.74%

-13.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

26.96%

-9.05%

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWVU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HKOD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWVU.L vs. HKOD.L - Dividend Comparison

IWVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than HKOD.L's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF
0.43%0.68%1.54%1.08%0.72%0.61%0.02%0.29%0.56%0.10%
IWVU.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.92%2.50%3.17%3.23%3.17%2.63%2.25%2.83%2.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWVU.L and HKOD.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVU.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVU.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOD.L.

IWVU.L tracks iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while HKOD.L tracks HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWVU.L and 0.50% for HKOD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWVU.L and HKOD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer