PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWMO.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IWVL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while IWMO.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L returned 12.86%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for IWMO.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVL.L achieves a 34.30% return, which is significantly higher than IWMO.L's 21.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L has underperformed IWMO.L with an annualized return of 12.86%, while IWMO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.

IWVL.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
12.22%
YTD
34.30%
6M
38.21%
1Y
66.32%
3Y*
30.35%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
12.86%

IWMO.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
7.92%
YTD
21.89%
6M
23.38%
1Y
33.87%
3Y*
29.58%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		34.30%40.41%5.13%19.53%-9.79%20.11%-3.67%18.13%-14.03%22.60%
IWMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		21.89%21.04%30.50%11.96%-17.97%14.13%28.58%27.14%-3.85%32.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVL.L and IWMO.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.75

The correlation between IWVL.L and IWMO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWVL.L
IWMO.L

Technology

33.9%
26.0%

Financial Services

14.8%
13.1%

Industrials

11.3%
18.7%

Healthcare

8.8%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
1.6%

Communication Services

7.6%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
1.5%

Energy

3.8%
10.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
6.0%

Utilities

2.5%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.4%

Technology

IWVL.L
33.9%
IWMO.L
26.0%

Financial Services

IWVL.L
14.8%
IWMO.L
13.1%

Industrials

IWVL.L
11.3%
IWMO.L
18.7%

Healthcare

IWVL.L
8.8%
IWMO.L
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IWVL.L
7.9%
IWMO.L
1.6%

Communication Services

IWVL.L
7.6%
IWMO.L
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

IWVL.L
4.5%
IWMO.L
1.5%

Energy

IWVL.L
3.8%
IWMO.L
10.6%

Basic Materials

IWVL.L
3.0%
IWMO.L
6.0%

Utilities

IWVL.L
2.5%
IWMO.L
3.7%

Real Estate

IWVL.L
1.8%
IWMO.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with IWVL.L:
IWVL.L vs. VWRA.LIWVL.L vs. IWDA.ASIWVL.L vs. IWQU.LIWVL.L vs. DFIVIWVL.L vs. VOOIWVL.L vs. URTHIWVL.L vs. VT
Often compared with IWMO.L:
IWMO.L vs. SPYIWMO.L vs. QMOMIWMO.L vs. VWRA.LIWMO.L vs. JPGL.LIWMO.L vs. IPRV.LIWMO.L vs. AVUVIWMO.L vs. AVDV

Return for Risk

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWVL.L
IWVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
IWMO.L
IWMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWVL.LIWMO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.24
1.85

+2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.85
2.81

+3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.34

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.55

2.90

+4.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.57

12.73

+15.84

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.24, which is higher than the IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVL.L and IWMO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWVL.LIWMO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24

1.85

+2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.74

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.86

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.80

-0.18

Drawdowns

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, which is greater than IWMO.L's maximum drawdown of -31.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVL.L and IWMO.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWVL.LIWMO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.30%

-31.52%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-11.61%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-19.40%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-29.63%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-31.52%

-7.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.78%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-6.03%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.65%

-0.34%

Volatility

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) have volatilities of 6.56% and 6.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWVL.LIWMO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

6.56%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

15.84%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

18.21%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

18.50%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

18.01%

-0.99%

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWVL.L and IWMO.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWVL.L vs. IWMO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWVL.L nor IWMO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

IWVL.L and IWMO.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVL.L and IWMO.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IWVL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IWMO.L is Momentum. IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while IWMO.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWVL.L and IWMO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer