IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L
IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IAUP.L (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IWVL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while IAUP.L is a Gold fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L returned 13.06%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for IAUP.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWVL.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IAUP.L.
Performance
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWVL.L achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than IAUP.L's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L has underperformed IAUP.L with an annualized return of 13.06%, while IAUP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.
IWVL.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 14.91%
- YTD
- 35.18%
- 6M
- 39.74%
- 1Y
- 67.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.59%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
IAUP.L
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 62.81%
- 3Y*
- 41.50%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 35.18% | 40.41% | 5.13% | 19.53% | -9.79% | 20.11% | -3.67% | 18.13% | -14.03% | 22.60% |
IAUP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.78% | 153.95% | 11.53% | 9.39% | -11.06% | -10.31% | 23.60% | 45.64% | -9.60% | 6.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWVL.L and IAUP.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014 | 0.23 |
The correlation between IWVL.L and IAUP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Financial Services
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Industrials
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
Healthcare
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Communication Services
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Energy
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Basic Materials
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
Utilities
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Real Estate
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWVL.L
IAUP.L
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWVL.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.25 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.73 | 2.19 | +5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.28 | 5.64 | +23.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWVL.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35 | 1.44 | +2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.52 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.41 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.09 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, smaller than the maximum IAUP.L drawdown of -79.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVL.L and IAUP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWVL.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.30% | -79.95% | +40.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -28.57% | +19.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -28.57% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | -44.90% | +18.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | -51.26% | +11.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -24.68% | +24.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -49.54% | +42.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 11.10% | -8.79% |
Volatility
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) is 6.53%, while iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) has a volatility of 14.96%. This indicates that IWVL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWVL.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 14.96% | -8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 35.03% | -22.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 43.38% | -27.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 35.32% | -19.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 34.55% | -17.53% |
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWVL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUP.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWVL.L vs. IAUP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWVL.L nor IAUP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWVL.L and IAUP.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IAUP.L.
IWVL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IAUP.L is Gold. IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while IAUP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWVL.L and 0.55% for IAUP.L.
Find the right allocation for IWVL.L and IAUP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer