IWVL.L vs. BATG.L
IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWVL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while BATG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWVL.L returned 16.43%/yr vs 16.72%/yr for BATG.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWVL.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATG.L.
Performance
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWVL.L is traded in USD, while BATG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWVL.L achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly lower than BATG.L's 37.31% return.
IWVL.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 14.91%
- YTD
- 35.18%
- 6M
- 39.74%
- 1Y
- 67.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.59%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
BATG.L
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 37.31%
- 6M
- 45.08%
- 1Y
- 134.04%
- 3Y*
- 29.28%
- 5Y*
- 16.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 35.18% | 40.41% | 5.13% | 19.53% | -9.79% | 20.11% | -3.67% | 18.13% | -19.18% |
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 37.31% | 72.52% | -1.20% | 8.25% | -14.18% | 15.94% | 80.75% | 17.48% | -24.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWVL.L and BATG.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IWVL.L and BATG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWVL.L
BATG.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
IWVL.L
BATG.L
Financial Services
IWVL.L
BATG.L
-
Industrials
IWVL.L
BATG.L
Healthcare
IWVL.L
BATG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWVL.L
BATG.L
Communication Services
IWVL.L
BATG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IWVL.L
BATG.L
-
Energy
IWVL.L
BATG.L
-
Basic Materials
IWVL.L
BATG.L
Utilities
IWVL.L
BATG.L
Real Estate
IWVL.L
BATG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWVL.L
BATG.L
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWVL.L | BATG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.66 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.73 | 9.24 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.28 | 29.91 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWVL.L | BATG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35 | 4.56 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.67 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.73 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, roughly equal to the maximum BATG.L drawdown of -40.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVL.L and BATG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWVL.L | BATG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.30% | -40.22% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -14.42% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -34.08% | +19.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | -34.08% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -3.08% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -12.12% | +4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 4.46% | -2.15% |
Volatility
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) is 6.53%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that IWVL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWVL.L | BATG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 10.49% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 23.29% | -10.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 29.23% | -13.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 24.96% | -8.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 24.89% | -7.87% |
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWVL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWVL.L vs. BATG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWVL.L nor BATG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWVL.L and BATG.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATG.L.
IWVL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BATG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWVL.L and 0.49% for BATG.L.
Find the right allocation for IWVL.L and BATG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer