PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVG.L achieves a 35.03% return, which is significantly higher than GBDV.L's 6.85% return.


IWVG.L

1D
0.87%
1M
16.42%
YTD
35.03%
6M
36.54%
1Y
64.97%
3Y*
25.57%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*

GBDV.L

1D
0.17%
1M
0.20%
YTD
6.85%
6M
5.97%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
35.03%27.50%5.20%13.05%1.04%21.47%-6.83%14.46%-8.49%
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
6.85%10.06%9.77%1.90%5.38%17.41%-11.68%16.85%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVG.L and GBDV.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between IWVG.L and GBDV.L has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWVG.L
GBDV.L

Technology

33.9%
2.2%

Financial Services

14.8%
24.9%

Industrials

11.3%
11.5%

Healthcare

8.8%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
2.4%

Communication Services

7.6%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.0%

Energy

3.8%
7.3%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.0%

Utilities

2.5%
15.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
12.1%

Technology

IWVG.L
33.9%
GBDV.L
2.2%

Financial Services

IWVG.L
14.8%
GBDV.L
24.9%

Industrials

IWVG.L
11.3%
GBDV.L
11.5%

Healthcare

IWVG.L
8.8%
GBDV.L
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IWVG.L
7.9%
GBDV.L
2.4%

Communication Services

IWVG.L
7.6%
GBDV.L
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

IWVG.L
4.5%
GBDV.L
8.0%

Energy

IWVG.L
3.8%
GBDV.L
7.3%

Basic Materials

IWVG.L
3.0%
GBDV.L
2.0%

Utilities

IWVG.L
2.5%
GBDV.L
15.9%

Real Estate

IWVG.L
1.8%
GBDV.L
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWVG.LGBDV.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.84

2.21

+2.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.47

3.08

+3.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.40

+0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.10

3.14

+5.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

33.81

9.84

+23.96

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.84, which is higher than the GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVG.L and GBDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWVG.LGBDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.84

2.21

+2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.28

0.62

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.65

+0.09

Drawdowns

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum GBDV.L drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVG.L and GBDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWVG.LGBDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-34.77%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-6.04%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-13.42%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.79%

-15.84%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.81%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-5.16%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.93%

-0.04%

Volatility

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) at 2.19%. This indicates that IWVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWVG.LGBDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

2.19%

+3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

6.49%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.37%

8.81%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

11.74%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

14.13%

+1.44%

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWVG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GBDV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWVG.L vs. GBDV.L - Dividend Comparison

IWVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
4.51%4.91%4.49%4.87%5.05%4.26%4.41%4.41%5.18%4.26%4.74%5.72%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.82%3.23%3.12%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWVG.L and GBDV.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.

IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWVG.L and 0.45% for GBDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWVG.L and GBDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer