IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L
IWVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and ESGG.L (Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Global Equities funds - IWVG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD while ESGG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWVG.L returned 16.67%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for ESGG.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWVG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ESGG.L.
Performance
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWVG.L is traded in GBP, while ESGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESGG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWVG.L achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than ESGG.L's 10.92% return.
IWVG.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 16.54%
- YTD
- 35.18%
- 6M
- 37.33%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 25.61%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGG.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 35.18% | 27.50% | 5.20% | 13.05% | 1.04% | 21.47% | -8.89% |
ESGG.L Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 10.92% | 12.19% | 20.44% | 19.21% | -11.17% | 22.81% | 9.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWVG.L and ESGG.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, IWVG.L and ESGG.L have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Financial Services
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Industrials
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Healthcare
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Consumer Cyclical
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Communication Services
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Consumer Defensive
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Energy
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Basic Materials
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Utilities
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Real Estate
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWVG.L
ESGG.L
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWVG.L | ESGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.49 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.08 | 3.84 | +5.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.80 | 15.16 | +18.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWVG.L | ESGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78 | 2.57 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.12 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than ESGG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVG.L and ESGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWVG.L | ESGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -23.30% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -7.11% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.79% | -18.64% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.79% | -18.64% | +4.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -2.98% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.81% | +0.08% |
Volatility
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) at 2.82%. This indicates that IWVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWVG.L | ESGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 2.82% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 7.87% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 10.66% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 16.23% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 19.73% | -4.16% |
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWVG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGG.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWVG.L vs. ESGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWVG.L nor ESGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG.L Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.82% | 3.23% | 3.12% | 2.61% | 2.37% | 2.90% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWVG.L and ESGG.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGG.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGG.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.
IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while ESGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWVG.L and 0.19% for ESGG.L.
Find the right allocation for IWVG.L and ESGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer