PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWVG.L is traded in GBP, while BCOM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCOM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVG.L achieves a 27.55% return, which is significantly higher than BCOM.L's 21.29% return.


IWVG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.15%
6M
22.89%
YTD
27.55%
1Y
54.17%
3Y*
24.43%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*

BCOM.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.31%
6M
16.66%
YTD
21.29%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
11.37%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
27.55%31.27%6.58%13.08%1.04%21.24%-6.86%14.68%-8.59%
BCOM.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF
21.29%7.91%6.26%-11.88%29.38%28.55%-5.84%1.14%-4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVG.L and BCOM.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018

0.22

The correlation between IWVG.L and BCOM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOM.L
BCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWVG.LBCOM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.30

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.71

2.29

+5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.07

6.99

+17.08

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVG.L and BCOM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, roughly equal to the maximum BCOM.L drawdown of -27.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVG.L and BCOM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWVG.LBCOM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-27.79%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-12.97%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-14.40%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.92%

-27.75%

+13.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-7.80%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-11.31%

+7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

4.20%

-1.96%

Volatility

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that IWVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWVG.LBCOM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

4.10%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

15.63%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.92%

17.81%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.44%

17.00%

-3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

16.02%

-0.34%

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWVG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOM.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWVG.L vs. BCOM.L - Dividend Comparison

IWVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while BCOM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BCOM.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.94%2.48%3.12%3.22%3.11%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWVG.L and BCOM.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCOM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCOM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.

IWVG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BCOM.L is Commodities. IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while BCOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWVG.L and 0.15% for BCOM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWVG.L and BCOM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer