PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. VNQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has outperformed VNQI with an annualized return of 10.51%, while VNQI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.


IWS

1D
1.16%
1M
4.03%
YTD
16.45%
6M
15.28%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
10.51%

VNQI

1D
0.68%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
0.85%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
2.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. VNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
16.45%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
-0.33%21.38%-2.22%6.99%-22.94%5.93%-7.22%21.59%-9.44%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and VNQI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010

0.69

The correlation between IWS and VNQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWS vs. VNQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
VNQI

Technology

18.2%
0.2%

Industrials

16.5%
0.7%

Financial Services

13.7%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
1.1%

Real Estate

8.2%
91.2%

Energy

7.7%
0.3%

Healthcare

7.5%
0.0%

Utilities

6.5%
0.1%

Basic Materials

5.4%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
0.1%

Communication Services

3.0%

-

Technology

IWS
18.2%
VNQI
0.2%

Industrials

IWS
16.5%
VNQI
0.7%

Financial Services

IWS
13.7%
VNQI
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.4%
VNQI
1.1%

Real Estate

IWS
8.2%
VNQI
91.2%

Energy

IWS
7.7%
VNQI
0.3%

Healthcare

IWS
7.5%
VNQI
0.0%

Utilities

IWS
6.5%
VNQI
0.1%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.4%
VNQI
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.8%
VNQI
0.1%

Communication Services

IWS
3.0%
VNQI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. VNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWSVNQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.09

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

0.40

+3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

1.13

+12.69

IWS vs. VNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the VNQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and VNQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWS vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than VNQI's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and VNQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSVNQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-38.35%

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-14.78%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-16.35%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-35.55%

+14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-38.35%

-5.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.99%

+9.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-10.89%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

5.19%

-3.19%

Volatility

IWS vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 4.29%, while Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSVNQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.62%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

11.75%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

13.73%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

15.54%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

16.07%

+3.30%

IWS vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWS vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than VNQI's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.32%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.72%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and VNQI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQI has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to IWS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs VNQI's -38.35%.

On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.51% vs 2.74% for VNQI. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VNQI is REIT. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.12% for VNQI.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and VNQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer