PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. TPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. TPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly higher than TPHD's 8.56% return.


IWS

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.74%
YTD
15.06%
6M
15.13%
1Y
27.01%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
10.23%

TPHD

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
8.56%
6M
7.69%
1Y
13.23%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. TPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.06%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%8.42%
TPHD
Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF
8.56%8.28%12.14%8.86%-1.91%27.98%-1.30%10.35%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and TPHD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019

0.91

The correlation between IWS and TPHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWS vs. TPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
TPHD

Industrials

16.7%
18.3%

Technology

16.5%
8.8%

Financial Services

14.1%
12.6%

Real Estate

8.6%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
8.9%

Energy

8.1%
15.4%

Healthcare

7.3%
2.5%

Utilities

7.0%
24.1%

Basic Materials

5.4%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.1%
0.0%

Industrials

IWS
16.7%
TPHD
18.3%

Technology

IWS
16.5%
TPHD
8.8%

Financial Services

IWS
14.1%
TPHD
12.6%

Real Estate

IWS
8.6%
TPHD
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.4%
TPHD
8.9%

Energy

IWS
8.1%
TPHD
15.4%

Healthcare

IWS
7.3%
TPHD
2.5%

Utilities

IWS
7.0%
TPHD
24.1%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.4%
TPHD
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.8%
TPHD
4.2%

Communication Services

IWS
3.1%
TPHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. TPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TPHD
TPHD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. TPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWSTPHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.27

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

1.92

+1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.19

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.59

6.20

+7.38

IWS vs. TPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the TPHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and TPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWSTPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.27

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.59

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.51

-0.09

Drawdowns

IWS vs. TPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than TPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and TPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSTPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-41.71%

-20.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-6.08%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-15.89%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-16.54%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-3.25%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-4.73%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.14%

-0.15%

Volatility

IWS vs. TPHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD) at 2.60%. This indicates that IWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSTPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.60%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

7.35%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

10.48%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

14.60%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

19.63%

-0.27%

IWS vs. TPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TPHD's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWS vs. TPHD - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than TPHD's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
TPHD
Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF
2.00%2.10%2.09%2.19%2.38%1.86%2.38%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and TPHD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWS has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to TPHD (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs TPHD's -41.71%.

On 5-year performance, TPHD leads with 8.52% vs 8.37% for IWS. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, TPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TPHD has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPHD.

TPHD has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.34% for IWS.

IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while TPHD tracks Victory US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted BRI Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.52% for TPHD.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and TPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer