PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWQU.L achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than DTLA.L's -0.86% return.


IWQU.L

1D
1.73%
1M
1.38%
YTD
8.72%
6M
9.99%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
12.75%

DTLA.L

1D
0.44%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
0.88%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
-1.20%
5Y*
-6.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWQU.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
8.72%15.28%17.17%25.90%-19.26%23.70%14.95%29.64%-7.88%
DTLA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.86%4.49%-6.90%1.69%-30.29%-4.46%17.00%15.69%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IWQU.L and DTLA.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018

-0.06

The correlation between IWQU.L and DTLA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWQU.L
IWQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DTLA.L
DTLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWQU.LDTLA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.06

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

0.45

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

1.12

+8.78

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWQU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWQU.L and DTLA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWQU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.05%, smaller than the maximum DTLA.L drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWQU.L and DTLA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWQU.LDTLA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.05%

-48.41%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.53%

-7.50%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.09%

-18.57%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.70%

-42.80%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-40.40%

+40.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-24.06%

+19.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.00%

-0.94%

Volatility

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWQU.LDTLA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.33%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

6.74%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

10.03%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

14.95%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

14.79%

+0.97%

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWQU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLA.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWQU.L vs. DTLA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWQU.L nor DTLA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWQU.L and DTLA.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWQU.L.

IWQU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while DTLA.L is Government Bonds. IWQU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWQU.L and 0.07% for DTLA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWQU.L and DTLA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer