IWQU.L vs. COMM.L
IWQU.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS) and COMM.L (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWQU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while COMM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWQU.L returned 10.34%/yr vs 11.05%/yr for COMM.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWQU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for COMM.L.
Performance
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWQU.L is traded in USD, while COMM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the COMM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWQU.L achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than COMM.L's 24.35% return.
IWQU.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 20.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
COMM.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 24.35%
- 6M
- 24.27%
- 1Y
- 37.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- —
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWQU.L iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS | 8.47% | 15.28% | 17.38% | 25.66% | -19.26% | 23.70% | 14.95% | 29.64% | -7.53% | 10.59% |
COMM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 24.35% | 16.72% | 4.42% | -7.94% | 14.62% | 27.87% | -4.24% | 7.31% | -10.24% | 5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWQU.L and COMM.L is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between IWQU.L and COMM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWQU.L
COMM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
IWQU.L
COMM.L
Financial Services
IWQU.L
COMM.L
Industrials
IWQU.L
COMM.L
-
Healthcare
IWQU.L
COMM.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWQU.L
COMM.L
Communication Services
IWQU.L
COMM.L
Consumer Defensive
IWQU.L
COMM.L
Energy
IWQU.L
COMM.L
-
Basic Materials
IWQU.L
COMM.L
Utilities
IWQU.L
COMM.L
-
Real Estate
IWQU.L
COMM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWQU.L
COMM.L
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWQU.L | COMM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 5.12 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 11.73 | -1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWQU.L | COMM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.11 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.65 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.54 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWQU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.05%, roughly equal to the maximum COMM.L drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWQU.L and COMM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWQU.L | COMM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.05% | -33.13% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -7.32% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.09% | -11.43% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.70% | -26.35% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.63% | +5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -12.63% | +7.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 3.20% | -1.13% |
Volatility
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) is 3.18%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that IWQU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWQU.L | COMM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 6.37% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 16.06% | -7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.45% | 17.74% | -6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 17.00% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 15.62% | +0.19% |
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWQU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than COMM.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWQU.L vs. COMM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWQU.L nor COMM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWQU.L and COMM.L have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWQU.L.
IWQU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while COMM.L is Commodities. IWQU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while COMM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWQU.L and 0.19% for COMM.L.
Find the right allocation for IWQU.L and COMM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer