IWMY vs. TSLY
IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. IWMY is passively managed, while TSLY is actively managed. Over the past year, IWMY returned 23.33% vs 24.54% for TSLY. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWMY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TSLY.
Performance
IWMY vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than TSLY's -1.68% return.
IWMY
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 12.25% | 10.18% | 5.56% | 9.74% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.68% | 13.62% | 27.83% | 18.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMY and TSLY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMY vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
IWMY
TSLY
IWMY vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWMY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.14 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.14 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | 2.75 | +3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWMY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 0.65 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.30 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
IWMY vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum TSLY drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -49.52% | +30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -21.64% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -8.07% | +6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -20.00% | +17.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 9.10% | -5.59% |
Volatility
IWMY vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) is 5.42%, while YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 9.96% | -4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 22.37% | -9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 38.18% | -22.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 45.50% | -29.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 45.50% | -29.75% |
IWMY vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWMY vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%, less than TSLY's 83.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 45.96% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.79% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMY and TSLY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to IWMY (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 24.54% vs 23.33% for IWMY. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 24.54% return vs 23.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 83.79%, compared with 45.96% for IWMY.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 1.07% for TSLY.
IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWMY and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer