IWMY vs. RDTY
IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and RDTY (YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while RDTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IWMY is passively managed, while RDTY is actively managed. Over the past year, IWMY returned 24.81% vs 25.49% for RDTY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWMY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for RDTY.
Performance
IWMY vs. RDTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IWMY having a 13.83% return and RDTY slightly lower at 13.72%.
IWMY
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 13.83%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDTY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY vs. RDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 13.83% | 11.78% |
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 13.72% | 10.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMY and RDTY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IWMY and RDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMY vs. RDTY — Risk / Return Rank
IWMY
RDTY
IWMY vs. RDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWMY | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.78 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 9.38 | -2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWMY | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.51 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.93 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
IWMY vs. RDTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, which is greater than RDTY's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and RDTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMY | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -17.31% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -9.20% | -2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.59% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -2.74% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 2.73% | +0.78% |
Volatility
IWMY vs. RDTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) is 5.37%, while YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMY | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 5.92% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 12.45% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 16.98% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 22.05% | -6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 22.05% | -6.29% |
IWMY vs. RDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWMY vs. RDTY - Dividend Comparison
IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.16%, more than RDTY's 43.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 46.16% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 43.97% | 36.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMY and RDTY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDTY has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to IWMY (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs RDTY's -17.31%.
On 1-year performance, RDTY leads with 25.49% vs 24.81% for IWMY. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RDTY has performed better with a 25.49% return vs 24.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 46.16%, compared with 43.97% for RDTY.
IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while RDTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 1.01% for RDTY.
IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWMY and RDTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer