IWMY vs. RDTY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and RDTY (YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while RDTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IWMY is passively managed, while RDTY is actively managed. Over the past year, IWMY returned 21.49% vs 23.90% for RDTY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWMY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for RDTY.

Performance

IWMY vs. RDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than RDTY's 16.87% return.

IWMY

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 12.53%
• 1Y: 21.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDTY

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 4.30%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 23.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. RDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	15.11%	10.65%
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.87%	10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and RDTY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.86

The correlation between IWMY and RDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWMY vs. RDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 40
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 38
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

RDTY

RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 48
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. RDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWMY	RDTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.38	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.97	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	2.61	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.09	8.73	-2.64

IWMY vs. RDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the RDTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and RDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. RDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, which is greater than RDTY's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and RDTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMY	RDTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.72%	-17.31%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.57%	-9.20%	-2.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-1.03%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-2.67%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	2.75%	+0.79%

Volatility

IWMY vs. RDTY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) at 5.74%. This indicates that IWMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMY	RDTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	5.74%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.54%	13.15%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.36%	17.51%	-1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.93%	22.03%	-6.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.93%	22.03%	-6.10%

IWMY vs. RDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWMY vs. RDTY - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.68%, more than RDTY's 42.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	43.68%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	42.37%	36.75%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMY and RDTY in my portfolio?

IWMY and RDTY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWMY or RDTY?

IWMY has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to RDTY (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs RDTY's -17.31%.

Which ETF is better, IWMY or RDTY?

On 1-year performance, RDTY leads with 23.90% vs 21.49% for IWMY. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RDTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWMY or RDTY?

Over the 1-year period, RDTY has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 21.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMY or RDTY?

IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMY or RDTY?

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 43.68%, compared with 42.37% for RDTY.

What is the main difference between IWMY and RDTY?

IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while RDTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 1.01% for RDTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.