IWMY vs. IVVB
IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. IWMY is passively managed, while IVVB is actively managed. Over the past year, IWMY returned 23.33% vs 14.57% for IVVB. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVB.
Performance
IWMY vs. IVVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than IVVB's 4.57% return.
IWMY
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVB
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY vs. IVVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 12.25% | 10.18% | 5.56% | 9.74% |
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 4.57% | 9.60% | 18.66% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMY and IVVB is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IWMY and IVVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMY vs. IVVB — Risk / Return Rank
IWMY
IVVB
IWMY vs. IVVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWMY | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.55 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | 10.94 | -4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWMY | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.02 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.31 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
IWMY vs. IVVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, which is greater than IVVB's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and IVVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMY | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -13.08% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -5.75% | -5.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.15% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -1.61% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 1.34% | +2.17% |
Volatility
IWMY vs. IVVB - Volatility Comparison
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) at 0.74%. This indicates that IWMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMY | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 0.74% | +4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 5.49% | +7.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 7.27% | +8.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 9.28% | +6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 9.28% | +6.47% |
IWMY vs. IVVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWMY vs. IVVB - Dividend Comparison
IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%, more than IVVB's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 45.96% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMY and IVVB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWMY has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to IVVB (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs IVVB's -13.08%.
On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 23.33% vs 14.57% for IVVB. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IVVB has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 23.33% return vs 14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 1.17% for IVVB.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 0.50% for IVVB.
IVVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWMY and IVVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer