IWMY vs. GLDY
IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while GLDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. IWMY is passively managed, while GLDY is actively managed. Over the past year, IWMY returned 23.33% vs 13.84% for GLDY. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
IWMY vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -2.30% return.
IWMY
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 12.25% | 11.88% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -2.30% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMY and GLDY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMY vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank
IWMY
GLDY
IWMY vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWMY | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.16 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.03 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | 2.47 | +4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWMY | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 0.70 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.56 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
IWMY vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and GLDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMY | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -13.43% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -13.43% | +1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -13.12% | +11.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -3.91% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 5.61% | -2.10% |
Volatility
IWMY vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.56%. This indicates that IWMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMY | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 4.56% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 18.27% | -5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 19.87% | -4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 19.58% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 19.58% | -3.83% |
IWMY vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IWMY and GLDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
IWMY vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison
IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%, which matches GLDY's 46.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 46.42% | 37.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 45.96% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMY and GLDY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWMY has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GLDY (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs GLDY's -13.43%.
On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 23.33% vs 13.84% for GLDY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 23.33% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWMY and GLDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 46.42%, compared with 45.96% for IWMY.
IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while GLDY is Derivative Income.
IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWMY and GLDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer