PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMY vs. GLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMY vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -2.30% return.


IWMY

1D
-1.36%
1M
3.06%
YTD
12.25%
6M
10.99%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDY

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and GLDY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMY vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDY
GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMYGLDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.03

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.66

2.47

+4.18

IWMY vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the GLDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and GLDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMYGLDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.70

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.56

+0.40

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and GLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMYGLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-13.43%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-13.43%

+1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-13.12%

+11.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-3.91%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

5.61%

-2.10%

Volatility

IWMY vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.56%. This indicates that IWMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMYGLDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

4.56%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

18.27%

-5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

19.87%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

19.58%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

19.58%

-3.83%

IWMY vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWMY and GLDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

IWMY vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%, which matches GLDY's 46.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GLDY
Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF
46.42%37.38%0.00%0.00%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
45.96%63.33%107.92%11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMY and GLDY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GLDY (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs GLDY's -13.43%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 23.33% vs 13.84% for GLDY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 23.33% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWMY and GLDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 46.42%, compared with 45.96% for IWMY.

IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while GLDY is Derivative Income.

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMY and GLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer