PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMW vs. HSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWMW vs. HSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWMW vs. HSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
0.35%7.82%6.09%
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
2.29%1.57%10.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMW achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than HSMV's 2.29% return.


IWMW

1D
0.38%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
0.35%
6M
1.81%
1Y
14.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HSMV

1D
0.49%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
2.29%
6M
1.33%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWMW vs. HSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HSMV's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWMW vs. HSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMW
IWMW Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IWMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMW Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HSMV
HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMW vs. HSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMWHSMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.19

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

0.37

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.05

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

0.28

+0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.69

1.03

+3.66

IWMW vs. HSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMW Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the HSMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMW and HSMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMWHSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.19

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.68

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between IWMW and HSMV is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IWMW vs. HSMV - Dividend Comparison

IWMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.48%, more than HSMV's 2.02% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
22.48%20.98%17.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
2.02%2.01%1.43%1.43%1.26%0.76%0.80%

Drawdowns

IWMW vs. HSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMW drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, which is greater than HSMV's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMW and HSMV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMWHSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-19.16%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-10.57%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-5.13%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-5.71%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.91%

+0.16%

Volatility

IWMW vs. HSMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) at 3.58%. This indicates that IWMW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWMWHSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

3.58%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

7.14%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

13.62%

+4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

15.01%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

16.18%

+0.38%