PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMW vs. FYEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMW vs. FYEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMW achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly higher than FYEE's 7.03% return.


IWMW

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.04%
YTD
8.49%
6M
8.94%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FYEE

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.22%
YTD
7.03%
6M
8.52%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMW vs. FYEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
8.49%7.82%4.82%
FYEE
Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF
7.03%15.76%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMW and FYEE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024

0.72

The correlation between IWMW and FYEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMW vs. FYEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMW
IWMW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IWMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMW Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FYEE
FYEE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FYEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYEE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FYEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYEE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMW vs. FYEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMWFYEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.52

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.35

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

17.14

-4.81

IWMW vs. FYEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMW Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FYEE Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMW and FYEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMWFYEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.57

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.24

-0.60

Drawdowns

IWMW vs. FYEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMW drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, which is greater than FYEE's maximum drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMW and FYEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMWFYEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-18.79%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-7.39%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.30%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-2.25%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.44%

+0.56%

Volatility

IWMW vs. FYEE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) at 1.43%. This indicates that IWMW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMWFYEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

1.43%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

7.26%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

9.64%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

13.84%

+2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

13.84%

+2.28%

IWMW vs. FYEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FYEE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWMW vs. FYEE - Dividend Comparison

IWMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.40%, more than FYEE's 7.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FYEE
Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF
7.57%7.08%5.45%
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
22.40%20.98%17.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMW and FYEE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMW has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to FYEE (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMW dropped -21.82% vs FYEE's -18.79%.

On 1-year performance, FYEE leads with 24.64% vs 24.62% for IWMW. On fees, FYEE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FYEE has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FYEE has performed better with a 24.64% return vs 24.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FYEE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IWMW.

IWMW has the higher dividend yield at 22.40%, compared with 7.57% for FYEE.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IWMW and 0.28% for FYEE.

FYEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMW and FYEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer