PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMO.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWMO.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWMO.L having a 21.89% return and IITU.L slightly higher at 22.95%. Over the past 10 years, IWMO.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 15.58%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 26.34% annualized return.


IWMO.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
5.62%
YTD
21.89%
6M
23.45%
1Y
33.45%
3Y*
29.58%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
15.58%

IITU.L

1D
-2.03%
1M
13.27%
YTD
22.95%
6M
22.91%
1Y
51.92%
3Y*
34.31%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*
26.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
21.89%21.04%30.50%11.96%-17.97%14.13%28.58%27.14%-3.85%32.09%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
22.96%23.07%38.50%58.65%-29.11%34.44%42.58%49.99%-1.62%37.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMO.L and IITU.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.78

The correlation between IWMO.L and IITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWMO.L
IITU.L

Technology

26.0%
99.6%

Industrials

18.7%
0.0%

Financial Services

13.1%

-

Healthcare

10.7%

-

Energy

10.6%
0.1%

Communication Services

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

6.0%

-

Utilities

3.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Technology

IWMO.L
26.0%
IITU.L
99.6%

Industrials

IWMO.L
18.7%
IITU.L
0.0%

Financial Services

IWMO.L
13.1%
IITU.L

-

Healthcare

IWMO.L
10.7%
IITU.L

-

Energy

IWMO.L
10.6%
IITU.L
0.1%

Communication Services

IWMO.L
6.8%
IITU.L

-

Basic Materials

IWMO.L
6.0%
IITU.L

-

Utilities

IWMO.L
3.7%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWMO.L
1.6%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IWMO.L
1.5%
IITU.L

-

Real Estate

IWMO.L
1.4%
IITU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMO.L
IWMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMO.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.07

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

9.27

+3.47

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMO.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMO.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.58

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

1.04

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

1.20

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.14

-0.34

Drawdowns

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMO.L drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMO.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMO.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-34.22%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-16.80%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-26.42%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.63%

-34.22%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.52%

-34.22%

+2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-3.20%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-5.93%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

5.59%

-2.94%

Volatility

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) is 6.56%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that IWMO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMO.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

7.00%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

15.11%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

20.05%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

23.19%

-4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

21.85%

-3.84%

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMO.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWMO.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWMO.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMO.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWMO.L.

IWMO.L is categorized as Momentum, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IWMO.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWMO.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMO.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer