PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWMO.L is traded in USD, while GBDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMO.L achieves a 21.89% return, which is significantly higher than GBDV.L's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IWMO.L has outperformed GBDV.L with an annualized return of 15.58%, while GBDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.20% annualized return.


IWMO.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
5.62%
YTD
21.89%
6M
23.45%
1Y
33.45%
3Y*
29.58%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
15.58%

GBDV.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
6.77%
6M
8.18%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
7.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
21.89%21.04%30.50%11.96%-17.97%14.13%28.58%27.14%-3.85%32.09%
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
6.78%18.36%7.94%7.28%-5.88%16.35%-8.98%21.54%-8.15%19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMO.L and GBDV.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between IWMO.L and GBDV.L has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWMO.L
GBDV.L

Technology

26.0%
2.2%

Industrials

18.7%
11.5%

Financial Services

13.1%
24.9%

Healthcare

10.7%
4.2%

Energy

10.6%
7.3%

Communication Services

6.8%
9.5%

Basic Materials

6.0%
2.0%

Utilities

3.7%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
8.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
12.1%

Technology

IWMO.L
26.0%
GBDV.L
2.2%

Industrials

IWMO.L
18.7%
GBDV.L
11.5%

Financial Services

IWMO.L
13.1%
GBDV.L
24.9%

Healthcare

IWMO.L
10.7%
GBDV.L
4.2%

Energy

IWMO.L
10.6%
GBDV.L
7.3%

Communication Services

IWMO.L
6.8%
GBDV.L
9.5%

Basic Materials

IWMO.L
6.0%
GBDV.L
2.0%

Utilities

IWMO.L
3.7%
GBDV.L
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWMO.L
1.6%
GBDV.L
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

IWMO.L
1.5%
GBDV.L
8.0%

Real Estate

IWMO.L
1.4%
GBDV.L
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMO.L
IWMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMO.LGBDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.40

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

7.39

+5.34

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMO.L and GBDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMO.LGBDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.45

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.46

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.51

+0.29

Drawdowns

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMO.L drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum GBDV.L drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMO.L and GBDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMO.LGBDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-41.93%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-7.52%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-12.05%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.63%

-20.80%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.52%

-41.93%

+10.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.58%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-5.81%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.44%

+0.21%

Volatility

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) at 2.74%. This indicates that IWMO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMO.LGBDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

2.74%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

6.93%

+8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

9.87%

+8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

13.90%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

15.80%

+2.21%

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMO.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GBDV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWMO.L vs. GBDV.L - Dividend Comparison

IWMO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
4.50%4.91%4.49%4.87%5.05%4.26%4.41%4.41%5.18%4.26%4.74%5.72%
IWMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMO.L and GBDV.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWMO.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWMO.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.

IWMO.L is categorized as Momentum, while GBDV.L is Global Equities. IWMO.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWMO.L and 0.45% for GBDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMO.L and GBDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer